Monday, January 26, 2009

ISRAEL SUGGESTS 18 MONTH TRUCE - HAMAS LOWERS IT TO 12

Taken from: http://www.zionism-israel.com/israel_news/

Hamas wants 1 year truce, Israel wants 18 months

http://zionism-israel.com/israel_news/2009/01/hamas-wants-1-year-truce-israel-wants.html
A Hamas official said Sunday that Israel has proposed to Egyptian mediators an 18-month cease-fire in the Gaza Strip, but the Islamist group - which controls the coastal territory - is insisting on a truce of just one year.
"Hamas listened to the Israeli proposal presented by [Defense Ministry official] Amos Gilad, and with it a proposal for a ceasefire for a year and a half, but Hamas presented a counterproposal of one year only," Ayman Taha told reporters in Cairo after talks with Egyptian intelligence officials.
Jerusalem has not yet released information on the results of Gilad's meeting in Egypt.

Taha reiterated the group's calls for a lifting of the blockade imposed on the impoverished and devastated Gaza Strip by Israel and Egypt as a condition for the truce. "[Hamas] called for a complete lifting of the blockade and an opening of all the crossings," Taha said.
Hamas proposed to Egyptian mediators that European and Turkish monitors be present at the border crossings, but rejected the presence of Israeli monitors, saying Israeli monitoring was "a large part of the problem," according to Taha.
Asked if Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas's forces would be present at the crossings, Taha said: "Hamas is the existing government in Gaza."
Hamas wrested control of the Gaza Strip from Abbas's Fatah faction in fighting in 2007. Egypt has ruled out opening the Rafah crossing in the absence of the Palestinian Authority and European Union observers.
Commenting on the talks, Hamas's representative in Lebanon, Osama Hamdan, told Al Jazeera satellite television on Sunday that Hamas was unwilling to alter its positions to Israel's benefit.
"The Israelis must understand that they will not achieve through politics what they failed to do militarily," Hamdan said.
Israel launched an offensive in the Gaza Strip in late December with the declared aim of ending Hamas rocket attacks on its southern communities. About 1,300 Palestinians, at least 700 of them civilians, were killed during the 22-day offensive, while Israel put its death toll at 10 soldiers and three civilians.

Hamas: No reconciliation with Fatah until it ends Israel peace talks
Hamas official Hamdan also said Sunday that Fatah movement must end peace negotiations with Israel before any reconciliation talks can take place.
The remarks were bound to complicate Arab efforts to reconcile Hamas, which controls Gaza, and the Fatah-dominated Palestinian Authority in the West Bank.
Speaking at a rally in Beirut Sunday, Hamdan - a close ally of Hamas political leader Khaled Meshal - said that the group welcomed Palestinian dialogue, but any reconciliation should be based on a resistance program to liberate territory and regain rights.
He also demanded that the PA end security coordination with Israel, and maintained that the Israeli-Palestinian peace process had ended.
"Those who committed mistakes must correct their mistakes through a clear and frank declaration to stop security coordination with the [Israeli] occupation, release [Hamas] prisoners and later end negotiations [with Israel] because the peace process is irreversibly over," said Hamdan.
"It's time for us to talk about a reconciliation based on a resistance program to liberate the [occupied] territory and regain rights," he added.
Hamas: No mediated truce unless Gaza borders opened
Earlier Sunday, Hamas spokesman Fawzi Barhoum said that the Islamist militant group would not accept any mediated truce agreement with Israel in Gaza unless Israel reopened the Palestinian territory's border crossings.
Barhoum made the comments ahead of talks with Egyptian officials on means to reopen the Gaza border, largely closed since the group violently took over Gaza in June 2007.
"We are not going to accept less than opening the borders ... and lifting the sanctions," said the spokesman, adding that discussions would address a detailed cease-fire agreement.
The issue of the crossings is key to preserving the cease-fire declared after Israel's 3-week offensive against Hamas in Gaza. Israel, the United States and Egypt are trying to work out security arrangements to ensure Hamas does not smuggle weapons into the strip before any opening.
Another Hamas spokesman, Ayman Taha, told London-based Asharq Al-Awsat newspaper Saturday that his group wants European Union and Turkish troops to patrol Gaza's border crossings with Israel.
"We reject an open-ended cease-fire, but temporary calm with guarantees can be discussed," he also said, without specifying how long.
A low-level delegation from Hamas' rival, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas' West Bank-based government, is also in Cairo for talks, but is not expected to meet with the Hamas envoys.
Asharq Al-Awsat also reported Saturday that Hamas had suggested representatives of the Palestinian Authority be stationed at the Rafah crossing, but that they be residents of Gaza, not the West Bank.
Israel has been allowing some supply convoys into Gaza, though its borders remain largely closed. The Israel Defense Forces says more than 125 trucks a day - on some days nearly 200 - have entered Gaza since fighting ended on January 17th, but aid workers say the numbers are not enough.

Sunday, January 25, 2009

Hacks not happy with Hamas

Sunday, January 25 2009

IFJ Slams Hamas Press Restrictions

The International Federation Of Journalists has slammed Hamas.
IFJ's Aiden White:

“In Gaza we found evidence of intimidation by Hamas. This is completely unacceptable. We understand that humanitarian help to media including safety vests for journalists in danger have been seized and confiscated. This is intolerable,” said White.

Another IFJ press release states:

"The last month has been hell for journalists working in Gaza, "said Aidan White. "It is impossible to properly investigate the media situation in Gaza without considering the difficulties facing journalists, particularly because of the Hamas regime. It is clear that Hamas are no friends of media freedom and have been ruthless in their intimidation and manipulation of the media. The situation of journalists in Gaza was already intolerable without military activity and this latest conflict has not made it any better. The IFJ is particularly concerned by Hamas' attempts to interfere in the work of Palestinian journalists. Now that the violence has stopped, it is time for all sides, including Hamas, to allow journalists to work freely."


Saturday, January 24, 2009

The BBC Under Fire

Within the space of a day, a huge row has erupted involving the BBC.


Unlike ITV, Channel 4 and Channel 5, the BBC has refused to air a public appeal for aid to Gaza.
BBC Trust chairman Sir Michael Lyons voiced concern that comments made by politicians are coming close to "undue interference" in the BBC's editorial independence.

He said that the judgment on whether the broadcast should be shown was not for the Trust, which oversees the Corporation on behalf of the public, but for the BBC's senior editorial executives, led by director general Mark Thompson.


On Friday night, Mr Thompson rejected a plea from International Development Secretary Douglas Alexander to screen the appeal.


"After consultation with senior news editors, we concluded that to broadcast a free-standing appeal, no matter how carefully couched, ran the risk of calling into question the public's confidence in the BBC's impartiality in its coverage of the story as a whole," he said.




Thousands of British people have marched through London in protest at this. A motion has been tabled in the House Of Commons for next week. But perhaps most bizarrely, the BBC is now being blamed for 'increasing the misery' of the Palestinians...!


Justice minister Shahid Malik, who was Britain's first Muslim minister, said:"Sadly, across the globe the BBC's decision will be viewed as one which inflicts still further misery on the beleaguered and suffering people of Gaza. "




So let's get this straight. The Palestinians elect Hamas, knowing it is a terrorist group that aims to kill all Israeli Jews. Hamas then spends several years terrorising Israeli and murdering Israeli civilians by way of suicide bombings and missile attacks. Finally Israel retaliates.


And now the BBC is to blame for what the Palestinians are suffering???


Well, I guess it makes a change from blaming Israel!


Seems that Britain is determined to blame everyone and everything but the Palestinians themselves.

It's also worth noting that when Israelis were being killed by Hamas, and Israeli schools and hospitals and towns were being destroyed, the world didn't give a damn, much less run public appeals for aid.

I'm no fan of the BBC, but if they do stick to their guns on this one, I will salute them.


If.
Here are links to some films well worth watching, courtesy of http://www.honestreporting.com



Shedding Light on the Gaza ‘Siege’
Flash Film
Time: 2 minutes
Date: June 2008
Subject: Who is really responsible for the suffering in Gaza? Are the media telling the truth when they blame Israel?
Cycle of Violence?
Flash Film
Time: 2 minutes
Date: March 2008
Subject: Israel's attempts to defend herself should never be equated with Palestinian acts of terrorism. There is no cycle of violence.
Seven Years on the Front Lines
Flash Film
Time: 2 minutes
December 2007
Subject: HonestReporting has been fighting media bias for seven years. See what a difference we can make together.
New Media, Same Old Bias
Flash Film
Time: 98 seconds
September 2007
Subject: Millions of people now get their news through the Internet. HonestReporting has developed a variety of cutting edge tools to promote fair and accurate reporting about the Middle East — wherever people get their information.
Relentless
"Relentless" is an important documentary for anyone interested in learning the truth about the Middle East conflict.
– Alan Dershowitz
American civil rights libertarian, Harvard University law professor, Leading Defence Attorney, and Author of "The Case for Israel"
15 Seconds
Flash Film
Time: 90 seconds
June 2007
Subject: In Sderot, children have just 15 seconds to take cover. Is the media covering this story accurately?
Are There Two Sides to Every Story?
Flash Film
Time: 90 seconds
March 2007
Subject: Israeli construction in Jerusalem's Old City is both legal and in accordance with international standards. So why do the media keep repeating unfounded claims?
Demand Accuracy
Flash Film
Time: 2 minutes
December 2006
Subject: HonestReporting's look back at the media's coverage of Israel in 2006.
Back To School
Flash Film
Time: 90 seconds
September 2006
Subject: As Palestinian children head back to school, are they being educated for peace or for violence?
Disproportionate
Flash Film
Time: 2.5 minutes
September 2006
Subject: Was it the Israeli military response to terror or the media's coverage of the conflict itself that was "Disproportionate"?
Lebanon: Myths and Facts
Flash Film
Time: 2.5 minutes
August 2006
Subject: A brief overview of the myths and facts surrounding Israel’s 2006 conflict with Hezbollah.
Stand Up
Flash Film
Time: 90 Seconds
September 2005
Subject: A call to action for fair treatment in the media regarding the use of the word "terror" and the portrayal of terrorism in Israel.
How Far Will They Go
Flash Film
Time: 60 seconds
August 2005
Subject: The media's portrayal of synagogue desecration after the Gaza withdrawal.
Five Years on the Front Lines
Flash Film
Time: 2 Minutes
April 2005
Subject: A brief overview of HonestReporting's first five years
Arafat's Dark Legacy
Flash Film
Time: 60 seconds
November, 2004
Subject: A brief overview of Arafat's Dark Legacy

The UN: doing sweet F A for Israel

The UN members must be really enjoying themselves at present. After all, we know they love nothing more than the chance to unfairly demonise Israel. This week, they are gleefully accusing Israel of 'war crimes'.

It's almost redundant to point out that this is absurd. Israel targetted terrorists and went to great lengths to warn before hitting buildings, so that innocents had the chance to escape. It was Hamas that had a nasty habit of shooting Palestinians in the legs to stop them escaping the Israeli assaults.

And where, you might wonder, are the UN condemnations of Hamas terrorism...?

Here is a great piece from http://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/

"Here is a list of war crimes and grave violations of humanitarian law that are not only well known but many of which Hamas openly admits to and brags about:
  • Deliberately targeting civilians
  • Attacking from within civilian areas and civilian structures, including hospitals and mosques
  • Using humanitarian symbols for attacks, such as by transporting terrorists in ambulances
  • Direct and public incitement to genocide
  • The systematic attacks against civilians upgrades that war crime into a crime against humanity
  • The recruitment of children into the conflict
  • Firing at the enemy while wearing civilian clothes
  • Wearing the uniforms of the enemy
  • Shooting rockets with phosphorus payloads deliberately at civilians
  • Not adhering to international standards on the treatment of prisoners of war
  • Immediate execution of alleged "collaborators" without a trial
  • Deliberately placing military targets, such as weapons caches and rocket launchers, among civilians
The worst I could find that the UN has said about Hamas was that rocket attacks against civilian targets are "unlawful." Usually the word "Hamas" is barely mentioned in these statements. No, the rocket attacks against civilians are "unlawful," sort of like jaywalking, and they happen by themselves being mentioned in a passive voice.

When will we be seeing the UN accusing Hamas of the obvious war crimes they have committed? When will we see UN officials call numerous press conferences that accuse Palestinian Arab groups of war crimes without mentioning Israel? When will we see committees set up for the purpose of investigating exposing Arab terror alone?

Only when the UN does so can we possibly entertain the idea that the UN is an honest, evenhanded organization that is truly concerned with violations of war crimes. Not by them mentioning as an aside that Hamas also does some not-so-nice things which do not justify Israel's actions, but when they focus on the many Arab terrorist war crimes exclusively as they have focused on Israel.

As it is, the UN in this context is simply a hate organization with a single-minded goal on vilifying the Jewish state alone."

Well said!


OK, this is getting seriously surreal.


Anyone who suffers through British coverage of the middle east will know that the bias against Israel is astonishing. Israeli fatalities are ignored, opinions are presented as 'facts' and deadly Iranian missiles that Hamas lobs into Israel are dismissed as 'firecrackers'.


Yet today, the BBC is actually being accused of PRO Israel bias!


A row has broken out after the BBC refused to screen an appeal for Gaza. The national broadcaster said it had rejected the ad as it might harm the BBC's reputation for 'impartiality' and because it could not be sure humanitarian aid would reach the needy in the chaotic territory.


The ad has also been turned down by numerous private investors.


International Development Secretary Douglas Alexander said the BBC had made the wrong decision. And - brace yourselves - Health Minister Ben Bradshaw called the BBC's decision inexplicable and accused the publicly funded broadcaster of being cowed by the Israeli government...!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


"I am afraid the BBC has to stand up to the Israeli authorities occasionally," Bradshaw said.


BBC director-general Mark Thompson said the Gaza crisis was "an ongoing and highly controversial news story." He said the BBC had decided "that to broadcast a free-standing appeal, no matter how carefully couched, ran the risk of calling into question the public's confidence in the BBC's impartiality in its coverage of the story as a whole.


Will the BBC stand firm?


Place your bets, please.


On a more serious note, Bradshaw's pathetic comment that the BBC is scared of the Israeli government has echoes of that old, weary, anti semitic refrain; 'the jews control the media'....


Shame on him.



Obama: wonderful friend to Hamas

Five minutes after becoming President and already Obama is willing to risk Israeli lives. He has now apparently told Israel that she 'must' open the border with Gaza. Oh, and never mind about all those crazed Hamas terrorists that love nothing better than strolling across said border, into Israel, with explosives strapped to their waists.

Hamas, has stated that 'Israel has until Sunday to open the border'.

Or what...?

Since when do America and a an Islamic terrorist group get to decide what happens with Israeli borders...?

We already know that Hamas has seized control of the tunnels through which arms from Iran get smuggled into Gaza via Egypt. Israel desperately tried to destroy them but recent reports suggest there may be 'thousands' of such tunnels.

Mind you, should we be that surprised at Obama's solidarity with Hamas? After all his very first phone call to a foreign leader was placed not to any of America's customary allies, but to the head of Fatah, Mahmoud Abbas. Abbas is a member of terrorist group PLO as well. How gratified he must have been, to have the new president of America placing him first on his list of people to chat to!

Obama has also stated that he is 'deeply concerned' about the loss of life in Gaza. No mention at all of the thousands of Israelis who have died at the hands of Hamas.

A large majority of American Jews voted for Obama.

I can only imagine they are now shaking their heads and muttering a collective 'Oy vey...'

http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=83365&sectionid=3510203